Legal Opinion

Reznik v. Garaffo

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 20, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark Reznik filed a petition pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, in the county court seeking, among other things, an order compelling the Superior Court to accept his notice of appeal from an order denying his motion to intervene in the underlying Superior Court action.2 Reznik had sought to intervene in the underlying case pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 24 (a) (2) and (b) (2), 365 Mass. 769 (1974). When he attempted to file a notice of appeal from that ruling, however, a second Superior Court judge ordered that the notice of appeal be returned on the ground that Reznik was not a party to the case.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Louisiana v. JackSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Elles v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Massachusetts Federation of Teachers v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Martin v. TapleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Driscoll v. T.R. White Company, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holland Brands SB, LLC v. Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2024
  2. Reznik v. MendesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API