Fisk Mining & Milling Co. v. Reed
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
The purpose of this action, commenced by appellees as plaintiffs, against appellant, as defendant, was to recover from the latter its alleged proportionate share of the expenses incurred by plaintiffs in draining mines operated by the parties in severalty. From a judgment for plaintiffs for twenty-seven thousand dollars, the defendant appeals.
The cause of action was stated in two counts. The first counted upon a contract between the parties, and the second upon the statute relating to the drainage of contiguous mining properties. According to the averments of the first count, it appears that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marie v. . GarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Frue v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
- Wood v. CasserleighSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Roberts v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1863
- Robert E. Lee Silver Mining Co. v. Omaha & Grant Smelt. & Ref. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dover Copper Mining Co. v. DoengesArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Blackwell v. KerchevalIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
- Hauser v. Rose Health Care SystemsColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Smaller v. LeachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Hewett v. SAMSONITE CORPORATIONColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.