Legal Opinion
Hauser v. Rose Health Care Systems
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 1993No. 91CA1630PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge RULAND.
Defendant, Rose Health Care Systems (Rose), appeals from a partial summary judgment determining that it entered into a binding contract with plaintiff, 0. Shannon Hauser, and from a subsequent judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding damages to plaintiff for breach of the contract. We affirm.
Plaintiff was engaged in the business Of consulting and contract negotiation. In July of 1989, plaintiff entered into a contract with the chief financial officer of Rose. This contract authorized plaintiff to renegotiate existing agreements Rose had with product and service…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. PlankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Fibreglas Fabricators, Inc. v. KylbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Tull v. Gundersons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- First Union National Bank v. Steele Software Systems Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Schuessler v. WolterColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- A-1 Auto Repair & Detail, Inc. v. Bilunas-HardyColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Miller v. ROWTECH, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Klein v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.