Legal Opinion

People v. Barber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable. County Court was not required to engage in any particular litany during the allocution in order to render the waiver valid (see, People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909, 910-911; People v Coleman [appeal No. 1], 219 AD2d 827). The record establishes that the waiver was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11). That waiver encompasses the contention of defendant that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statements…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. LococoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. MoissettNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API