Legal Opinion

United States v. Naranjo

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 24, 2014No. Criminal No. 1993-0418Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Crim. Action No. 93-418—04 (TFH) VS. JOSE NARANJO, Defendant. AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION1 Defendant Jose Naranjo has filed a “Motion to Vacate Judgment for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Petition for Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241; Alternative Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis; or Audita Querela or by Rule 60(b)” [ECF No. 600] (“Mot to Vacate”). Because this Court finds it lacks jurisdiction to entertain the defendant’s motion, the motion will be dismissed. In 1995, Naranjo was convicted of drug…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. GaviriaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. AkersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. Harris v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. United States v. Naranjo, JoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. TchibassaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API