Legal Opinion

United States v. Khamsouk

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 27, 2003No. NMCM 9900711PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARVER, Judge:

A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of fraudulent enlistment, five specifications of larceny, forgery, and 16 specifications of unauthorized use of another’s credit card, in violation of Articles 83, 121, 123, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 883, 921, 923, and 934. The appellant was sentenced to a bad-eon-duct discharge, confinement for 5 years, total forfeiture of pay and allowances, a fine of $2,500.00, and reduction to pay grade E-l. The convening authority approved the sentence as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  2. United States v. JenkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. KhamsoukCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  4. United States v. TuckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. GarmanArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  2. United States v. DearingNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  3. United States v. BellNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  4. United States v. BodkinsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  5. United States v. GatlinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API