Legal Opinion

Ross v. Ross

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1972No. 43262, 43330PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*116Otis, Justice.

The question for decision is whether persons who are not in the business of selling intoxicating liquor are liable under the Civil Damage Act, Minn. St. 340.95, for furnishing liquor to a minor, proximately causing his death. We hold that defendants are liable and affirm.

The facts are undisputed. On July 13, 1967, defendant-appellant Delmar Ross and defendant Joel Owen Johnson 1 purchased liquor for Delmar’s 19-year-old brother, Rodney Alan Ross, which, as the jury found, resulted in Rodney’s becoming intoxicated. By special verdict, the jury also found that Rodney’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Garcia v. HargroveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hahn v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. Williams v. KlemesrudSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. Dahlin v. KronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Coulter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Longstreth v. GenselMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Manning v. NobileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Trail v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API