The Dow Chemical Company v. Dart Industries, Inc., Brand Plastics Company v. The Dow Chemical Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The patent involved in this suit is Number 2,694,692. The District Court held that the patent was invalid, anticipated by certain prior arts and embracing a procedure that would have been obvious to one skilled in the prior art. The appellant vigorously challenges this conclusion, but we are not persuaded that we should disturb it. The trial was extensive, consuming some twenty days, with highly expert, opposing opinions expressed by different witnesses presented by the competing parties. This being true, we cannot hold that the District Court’s finding of fact in this respect was clearly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Florida Brace Corporation and Arthur R. Moore v. William L. Bartels and Prosthetic & Orthopedic Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rex Chainbelt Inc., (Cross-Appellee) v. Harco Products, Inc., Dba Dfc Company, (Cross-Appellant)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Codex Corporation v. Milgo Electronic Corporation, Codex Corporation v. Milgo Electronic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Interconnect Planning Corp. v. FeilDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Penn International Industries v. Pennington Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.