Legal Opinion

Interconnect Planning Corp. v. Feil

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 2, 1982No. 80 Civ. 6602 (KTD)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge:

In this action alleging patent infringement, defendants have moved for summary judgment. 1 Plaintiff Interconnect Planning Corporation (“IPC”), a New York corporation which manufactures various telephone equipment, contends that defendants Thomas E. Feil (“Feil”), Robert O. Carpenter, V Band Systems, Inc. (“V Band”) and Turret Equipment Corp. have infringed plaintiff’s patent for an electronic multiline telephone system. Defendants argue on the instant summary judgment motion that the plaintiff’s patent covered subject matter that was fully…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Interconnect Planning Corporation v. Thomas E. Feil, Robert O. Carpenter, v Band Systems, Inc., and Turret Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Diamond Scientific Co. v. Ambico, Inc. And Clarence Joseph WelterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Baladevon, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
  4. Contour Chair Lounge Co. v. True-Fit Chair, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1986
  5. Lemelson v. Synergistics Research Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API