Legal Opinion

Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 6, 1972No. Nos. 26239 and 26266PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

This case has already been before the court three times. On the first occasion we upheld the validity of the Kazenas patent and found two resins manufactured and marketed by Locklin to be infringing. Locklin v. Switzer Bros., 299 F.2d 160 (9th Cir. 1961), cert. denied 369 U.S. 861, 82 S.Ct. 950, 8 L.Ed.2d 18 (1962). On the second and third occasions we considered whether a resin known as “4-C” was also infringing. We held that it was. Locklin v. Switzer Bros., 348 F.2d 244 (9th Cir. 1965); Locklin v. Switzer Bros., 368 F.2d 553 (9th Cir. 1966) (per curiam), cert.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Park-In-Theatres, Inc. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Locklin v. Switzer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  3. Thomas E. Pickering v. Orval Holman, Thomas E. Pickering v. Orval HolmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. Carson Inv. Co. v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  5. Florida Brace Corporation and Arthur R. Moore v. William L. Bartels and Prosthetic & Orthopedic Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trw, Inc. v. Ellipse Corporation and Ford Motor Company, CorporationsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  2. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U. S. Department of Labor v. Kenneth RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. SSP Agricultural Equipment, Inc. v. Orchard-Rite Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. The Dow Chemical Company v. Dart Industries, Inc., Brand Plastics Company v. The Dow Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners, Dba Radiant Color Company v. Day-Glo Color Corp., Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners, Dba Radiant Color Company v. Day-Glo Color Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API