Rex Chainbelt Inc., (Cross-Appellee) v. Harco Products, Inc., Dba Dfc Company, (Cross-Appellant)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, * BARNES and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Circuit Judge:
This action was instituted by appellant Rex Chainbelt Inc. in the Federal District Court for the Central District of California against Harco Products, Inc. for infringement of Rex’s U. S. Patent No. 2,970,783. Harco answered the complaint alleging that the patent was unenforceable because of misuse, and that the patent was void as being “obvious” under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Harco also filed a cross-complaint alleging that Rex’s misuse of its patent and the bringing of this patent infringement suit…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Coastal States Marketing, Inc. And Valero Energy Corporation, Cross-Appellees v. Nelson Bunker Hunt, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Senza-Gel Corporation, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. John B. Seiffhart, Goehring Meat, Inc., and Ohi, Inc., Appellees/crossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.