Legal Opinion

Curling v. City Chevrolet

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 2007No. 104,009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ADAMS, Judge.

T1 Claimant Dallas E. Curling, III, appeals an order of a three-judge panel of the Workers' Compensation Court which applied 85 0.S8.8upp.2005 § 22(8)(d) and limited his award of temporary total disability (TTD) benefits to eight weeks. The Workers' Compensation Court's finding that Claimant sustained a soft tissue injury is supported by competent medical evidence and is sustained. However, the application of the 8-week limit on TTD benefits in § 22(8)(d) is vacated, and the matter remanded for entry of an order consistent with the statutory analysis adopted in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Earnest, Inc. v. LeGrandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Walker v. Group Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Davis v. Southwestern Bell TelephoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Gee v. All 4 Kids, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. v. BonatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Public Supply Co. v. SteenbockCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. CMI/Terex Corp. v. StevensCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. Curling v. City ChevroletCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API