Legal Opinion

Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. v. Bonat

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 2008No. 104,284PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.

T1 Certiorari review of this matter was granted to address a first impression issue concerning a patent ambiguity contained in a 2005 amendment to section 22 of the Workers' Compensation Act concerning the length of time a temporarily and totally disabled worker is entitled to disability benefits for a "soft tissue" injury. Today, this Court construes that ambiguity, applies section 22 to the claim presented in this matter, and determines that the Workers' Compensation Court correctly determined the length of time that the worker was entitled to temporary total disability and medical care. In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Cox v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Kratz v. KratzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Moran v. City of Del CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Russell v. Chase Investment Services, Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. Scott v. Sprint PCSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. STRICKLEN v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
  4. SEQUEL YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES LLC v. AYISICourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. Wilcoxson v. WOODWARD COUNTY EMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API