Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. Jones

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1926No. 6 Div. 989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

One of the last, if not the very last, pronouncement of the Supreme Court on the question of what it takes to constitute wantonness on the part of a railroad company, is to be found in the case of Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Martin, 213 Ala. 617, 619, 105 So. 805, 806, where it is said:

“One of the precautions- or duties imposed upon trainmen in passing a point known by them to be in such continuous use as a passway by pedestrians that some one is likely to be in a position of danger is to keep 'a lookout. If a curve in the track cuts off a proper lookout by the engineer, the duty devolves.upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. So. Ry. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Beatty v. PalmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. American Trust Co. of Nashville, Tenn. v. HannaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Louisville Nashville R. Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Campbell v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. RushAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API