Legal Opinion

Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Martin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 22, 1925No. 6 Div. 442PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is to recover damages for personal injuries. The complaint counts upon wanton injury, and upon negligence after discovery of peril.

The plaintiff was admittedly a trespasser, using defendant’s tracks as a walkway. Plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that the place of the accident, within the corporate limits ,of the town of Dora, was at the time in such frequent, continuous use as a roadway by persons in such numbers that some person was likely to be in an exposed position upon the track and liable to injury by running trains at that hour at a high rate of speed without due…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. So. Ry. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Grauer v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Southern Ry. Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Mobile Light R. Co. v. NicholasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Williams v. Roche Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API