Legal Opinion

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Rush

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1927No. 1 Div. 729PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.

The complaint, was in two counts. The first alleged simple negligence on the part of servants, agents, or employees of defendant in the operation or management of its locomotive engine, and the second charged wantonness.

As to the first count it is conceded that the plaintiff was herself guilty of contributory negligence which proximately contributed to her injury, in that she failed to observe the law to “stop, look, and listen” before driving her automobile onto defendant’s track. This precludes a recovery by reason of the initial negligence of defendant. Central of Georgia Railway v.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Mobile Light R. Co. v. GadikSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Alabama Great Southern R. R. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Bradshaw v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. ScottAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API