Legal Opinion

Washington International Insurance v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 9, 1989No. 84-09-01315PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

This case involves a dispute over liquidation of imported footwear from South Korea. At the time of entry the subject goods were given duty-free status. Customs later determined that such status did not apply, and a duty of 37.5% ad valorem was assessed. Plaintiff claims that the government failed to properly liquidate the subject goods at the increased duty rate within the one year period required by statute and accordingly, that the goods must be deemed liquidated at the rate at which they were entered, that is, duty-free. See 19 U.S.C. § 1504 (1982 & Supp IY 1986).…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peerless Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Ataka America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
  2. SRR v. RoblesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
  3. United States v. Cherry Hill Textiles, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1995
  4. American Hi-Fi International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API