Legal Opinion
United States v. Cherry Hill Textiles, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 30, 1995No. Court No. 94-09-00534PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Introduction
Newman, Senior Judge:
The government brings this collection action for recovery of unpaid customs duties in the sum of $12,220.62, plus *793interest, against Cherry Hill Textiles, Inc. (“Cherry Hill”), importer of record of certain dyeing machines entered duty free through the port of Newark on September 18, 1987, and International Cargo and Surety Insurance Company (“Intercargo”), the surety on the importer’s entry bond. Intercargo has filed a cross-claim against its co-defendant, Cherry Hill, to recover indemnification for any sums awarded to plaintiff. Jurisdiction…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cheatham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Linder v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Davison v. Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1978
- United States v. Utex International Inc., and Sentry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Computime, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fujitsu General America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000