SRR v. Robles
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Restani, Judge:
This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment and plaintiffs motion for writ of mandamus. Plaintiff alleges that seven entries of its merchandise made in 1989 have not been liquidated because the bulletin notice of liquidation was defective in that an entry number with a filer code was used, instead of the importer’s name. It asserts that because liquidation did not occur in a timely fashion, liquidation by operation of law has occurred and no additional duties are owed. See 19 U.S.C. § 1504 (1988). It also seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Utex International Inc., and Sentry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Gail Merchant Irving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Federal Insurance Company and Cometals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bundy v. United States District Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- MacDraw, Inc. v. CIT Group Equipment Financing, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Bundy v. United States District Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- American Hi-Fi International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995