Peerless Insurance v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
DiCARLO, Judge:
This action is before the Court following denial by the United States Customs Service (Customs) of a protest by the Peerless Insurance Company (Peerless) against payment as surety on a single-entry bond. The Court holds that Peerless did not file its protest within the 90 day statutory limit required by 19 U.S.C. § 1514(c)(2)(A) (1982). The Court dismisses this action for lack of jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
Peerless is the surety on a single-entry bond for laminated boxes imported from Finland by the principal on the bond, the Asoma Corporation (Asoma). The Asoma bond was issued for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Magee v. Manhattan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Old Republic Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- San Francisco Newspaper Printing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Halperin Shipping Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- American Motorists Insurance v. VillanuevaUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- American Motorists Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Washington International Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- United States v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.