Legal Opinion

Peerless Insurance v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 30, 1988No. Court 87-06-00721PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DiCARLO, Judge:

This action is before the Court following denial by the United States Customs Service (Customs) of a protest by the Peerless Insurance Company (Peerless) against payment as surety on a single-entry bond. The Court holds that Peerless did not file its protest within the 90 day statutory limit required by 19 U.S.C. § 1514(c)(2)(A) (1982). The Court dismisses this action for lack of jurisdiction.

BACKGROUND

Peerless is the surety on a single-entry bond for laminated boxes imported from Finland by the principal on the bond, the Asoma Corporation (Asoma). The Asoma bond was issued for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Magee v. Manhattan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Old Republic Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. San Francisco Newspaper Printing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Halperin Shipping Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  2. American Motorists Insurance v. VillanuevaUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  3. American Motorists Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  4. Washington International Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  5. United States v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API