Legal Opinion

Fine v. Huygens, DiMella, Shaffer & Associates

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 20, 2003No. 99-P-2007PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuefly, J.

After our decision in this matter, see 55 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 (2002), issued pursuant to Appeals Court Rule 1:28, as amended, 46 Mass. App. Ct. 1001 (1998), we granted the petitions for rehearing submitted by three of the defendants, and heard argument thereon on November 26, 2002. Our earlier decision, reversing in part the dismissal of the plaintiffs’ claims as not timely filed, was in connection with the plaintiffs’ appeal from entry of summary judgment in favor of nine of twelve defendants who played varying roles in the planning and construction of a condominium development, the St.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Cosme v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Calimlim v. Foreign Car Center, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Bay State-Spray & Provincetown Steamship, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Berish v. BornsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. Phaneuf Funeral Home v. Little Giant Pump Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  3. Bridgwood v. A.J. Wood Construction, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. Smith v. Robertshaw Controls Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Sonin v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API