Legal Opinion

Bay State-Spray & Provincetown Steamship, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 13, 1989PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

In 1972 the plaintiff (Steamship), which operates a passenger ferry service betweeen Boston and Provincetown, ordered the ship “Provincetown” built by a shipyard. The shipyard installed engines that had been manufactured by the defendant (Caterpillar). The ship began commercial operation in 1973. On August 17, 1980, while the ship was en route to Provincetown, its main starboard engine malfunctioned. As a result, the ship’s operating schedule during the next month was disrupted. Steamship commenced this action in May, 1982, to recover damages for the cost of repair and for lost profits caused…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Swartz v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Herbert A. Sullivan, Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Nota Construction Corp. v. Keyes Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  4. Maillet v. ATF-Davidson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. FMR Corp. v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API