Legal Opinion

Uber Techs., Inc. v. Google LLC

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided September 28, 2018No. A153653PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiggins, P.J.

Anthony Levandowski and Lior Ron are former Google LLC (Google) employees who started the self-driving vehicle company Ottomotto LLC (Otto). Google considered Otto a competitor to its own self-driving vehicle project. After Otto was acquired by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Uber), Google initiated arbitration proceedings against its two former employees for allegedly breaching their employment contracts, breaching their fiduciary duties, fraud, tortious interference with Google's employment relationships, and other claims. Google sought discovery from Uber, a nonparty to the arbitration, related…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aixtron, Inc. v. Veeco Instruments Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Golzarifar v. Google LLC CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Wood v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Wood v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API