Legal Opinion

Oakes v. Finlay

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1898No. Civil No. 596PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. J. D. Bethune, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDoan, J.

This was an action brought in the district court of Pima County, by Samuel W. Finlay against George "W. Oakes, to contest an election held in the city of Tucson, Arizona, on the fourteenth day of December, 1896, at which the parties to this suit were rival candidates for the office of city marshal. The returns of the election board showed that Oakes received at said election three hundred and eleven votes; that Finlay received three hundred votes. The city council of the city of Tucson thereafter, on the sixteenth day of December, met, and canvassed the returns, and declared that Oakes, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tebbe v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People ex rel. Dickinson v. SackettMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Dorey v. LynnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  4. Young v. DemingUtah Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Spidle v. McCrackenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hunt v. CampbellArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Burke v. BeasleySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Finley v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Pusch v. BradyArizona Supreme Court · 1898
  5. State ex rel. Minehan v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API