Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Dickinson v. Sackett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1866PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The motion for a new trial of the issues of fact in this cause, and for leave to amend the pleadings therein, which was heretofore argued, (seep. 243 ante), was now re-argued upon the affidavits filed for and against the motion, and upon the report of the Cii'Cuit Judge of the Sixth Circuit of the proceedings in the Circuit Court, for the county of Macomb, upon the trial of said issues of fact.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.

This is a case wherein the relator is contesting with the respondent the title to the office of Register of Deeds for Macomb County, by proceedings under an information in the nature of a quo warranto. The pleadings admit that the relator was returned as having the majority of legal votes, but issues are tendered setting up several irregularities and mistakes, which seem to have been confined chiefly to the towns of Clinton and Sterling. Upon the pleadings several issues were framed and sent down to Macomb County for trial, where a jury in January last made separate findings on…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gilleland v. SchuylerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. People ex rel. Williams v. CicottMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Edwards v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  4. People Ex Rel. Dailey v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Hartman v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API