Legal Opinion

Spidle v. McCracken

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Ness District Court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

VALENTINE, J.:

It is urged strenuously by the defendant in error that “the paper filed with the petition in error in this cause, which purports to be the proceedings of an election-contest court, and upon which the plaintiff in error relies for a hearing of his alleged grievances, is without any legal or valid authenticity or the legal attributes that entitle it to be considered by this court;” but passing over the question thus presented, and without deciding it, and to the merits of the case, and considering- “the paper filed with the petition in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hudson v. SolomonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Dorey v. LynnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. Coglan v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. CampbellArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Campbell v. RamseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Thornhill v. WearSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. Oakes v. FinlayArizona Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API