Legal Opinion

Keeton v. Henning

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1969No. Civ. 24664PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SHOEMAKER, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant in an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence.

The evidence is without conflict. Plaintiff Chester Keeton and defendant Ralph Henning were transporting a ton of hay on Henning’s pickup truck to a barn in Mountain View, where they intended to unload the hay. When they reached the area of the bam, defendant put the truck in a position to back up toward the barn door in order that the hay could be unloaded and placed in the barn. Plaintiff testified that it was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Di Mare v. CresciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Vierra v. Fifth Avenue Rental ServiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Springer v. ReimersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Bedford v. ReCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Blackwell v. HurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Albers v. Greyhound Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Smith v. Dhy-Dynamic Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API