Keeton v. Henning
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SHOEMAKER, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant in an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence.
The evidence is without conflict. Plaintiff Chester Keeton and defendant Ralph Henning were transporting a ton of hay on Henning’s pickup truck to a barn in Mountain View, where they intended to unload the hay. When they reached the area of the bam, defendant put the truck in a position to back up toward the barn door in order that the hay could be unloaded and placed in the barn. Plaintiff testified that it was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Di Mare v. CresciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Vierra v. Fifth Avenue Rental ServiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Springer v. ReimersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bedford v. ReCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Blackwell v. HurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Albers v. Greyhound Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Smith v. Dhy-Dynamic Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.