Wilson v. John Crane, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEPULVEDA, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs Lois and Daniel Wilson, Sr. 1 following a jury trial on their claims for personal injuries and loss of consortium arising from the latter’s exposure to asbestos. Defendant John Crane, Inc., raises numerous challenges to the judgment. Plaintiffs have cross-appealed from the judgment insofar as it limits their recovery of noneconomic damages to that proportion of such damages as the jury found attributable to defendant. We find no merit in either side’s arguments and affirm the judgment in its entirety.
Background
The parties…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Boeken v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Quiroz v. Seventh Avenue CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- El Escorial Owners' Ass'n v. DLC Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.