Sandoval v. Randolph
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum opinion by direction of the court.
By Mr. Justice Lurton.
Action for money had and received for the use of the plaintiff. A jury was waived and- there was judgment for plaintiff upon a special finding of fact. This judgment was affirmed by the court below, the court holding that there was evidence supporting the findings of fact, and that when that was the case the court could not go behind the facts so found.
The facts so found were in every essential respect the facts stated in the complaint. They were, in substance:
1. That the plaintiff procured the defendants to negotiate with the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Thomas v. NewcombArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Doyen v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Fink v. WeismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Thimsen v. ReigardOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.