Legal Opinion

People v. Lawrence

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2000No. S070271PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

When a defendant is sentenced under the three strikes law (Pen. Code, § 667, subds. (b)-(i))1 because he has previously been convicted of one or more serious and/or violent felony offenses (§ 667, subds. (b), (c)), the three strikes provisions mandate that “[i]f there is a current conviction for more than one felony count not committed on the same occasion, and not arising from the same set of operative facts, the court shall sentence the defendant consecutively on each count pursuant to [this section].” (§ 667, *223subd. (c)(6); hereafter sometimes subdivision (c)(6).)2 By…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. LoeunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sharon v. MinnockNevada Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Spanagel v. DellingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Ludy v. ZumwaltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Garber v. GianellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API