Legal Opinion
Novak v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 1, 2013No. 10 Civ. 9694 (RA)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge:
Plaintiff Shanti Novak brings this action against Defendants Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, Captain Scott Politano, Chief John Hennelly and Sergeant Kristen Brylinski (collectively, “Defendants”). Novak asserts claims of sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and sex discrimination and retaliation under the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”), N.Y. Exec. Law § 290, et seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-101, et seq. She also asserts state common law claims…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Trachtenberg v. Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Lopez v. Ctpartners Executive Search Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Nungesser v. Columbia UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Medcalf v. Thompson Hine LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Kohutka v. Town of HempsteadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.