Legal Opinion

Keegan v. Grant County Public Utility District No. 2

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 17, 1983No. 4612-5-IIIPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.

The Grant County Public Utility District 2 (PUD) appeals a jury finding of negligence stemming from the operation of its electrical system. We affirm as to liability but reverse and remand on the issue of damages.

The PUD operated a 3-wire overhead electrical distribu tion line near a farm owned by Dwight and Elizabeth Keegan but occupied by their son and his wife, Patrick and Denise Keegan. The electrical line ran near a row of poplar trees 100 to 150 feet in height. The PUD had an easement for removal of all brush and trees which might interfere with the construction, maintenance, and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Louisville Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  2. State v. HuelettWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McCurdy v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Walker v. BangsWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Scott v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Kenneth Richardson Norman J. Trapp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Michael SommerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Brashear v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API