Legal Opinion
United States v. $57,960.00 in United States Currency
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided July 28, 1999No. 7:98-2126-20AKPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HERLONG, District Judge.
This matter is before the court with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge William M. Ca-toe, Jr., made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02 DSC. 1 The United States alleges that the $57,960.00 is subject to forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). The claimant, David Anthony Babb (“Babb”), proceeding pro se, contends that he is the lawful owner of the subject property. A number of motions have been filed and are pending before the court. The Report and Recommendation was filed on May 28, 1999, and it recommends…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- William Longenette v. Peter Krusing William E. Perry, Special Agent Fbi Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Clymore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Larry Dean Dusenbery, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Fenley v. Wood Group Mustang, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Stransky v. Healthone of Denver, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.