Legal Opinion

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Larry Dean Dusenbery, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 2, 2000No. 98-4014, 98-4036PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSuhrheinrich, J., joined by Gibson, J.,

COLE, J. (p. 769), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.

*764OPINION

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Larry Dean Du-senbery appeals the district court’s judgment denying his motion under Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(e) for the return of forfeited property. Plaintiff-Appellee United States cross-appeals the district court’s ruling that its administrative forfeiture notices were constitutionally insufficient. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.

I. Background

In 1986, Dusenbery was convicted and incarcerated for possession and distribution of cocaine. See United States v. Dusenbery, No.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry Barr Sales Agency, Inc. v. All-Lock Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Jeffrey Wayne DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. $67,220.00 in United States Currency, Robert N. Easterly, Jr., Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. MarolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. GiraldoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. William Longenette v. Peter Krusing William E. Perry, Special Agent Fbi Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Two Answering MacHines One Health Tech Computer Reginald McGlory in No. 98-3578 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00138) United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry Reginald McGlory in No. 98-3579 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00370)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Curtis Bernard MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Gary H. Marolf, in Re Application for Return of Seized Property 1981 Mango Motor Sailboat Named "Asmara,"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Clymore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API