Legal Opinion

Clymore v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 13, 2001No. 00-2160PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Per curiam

Craig Clymore appeals for the second time from the dismissal with prejudice of his claims made pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e) for return of property administratively forfeited in federal proceedings. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse. 1

I. Background facts and proceedings

The factual history of this case is well documented in Clymore v. United States, 164 F.3d 569 (10th Cir.1999), and need not be repeated here. There, in reversing summary judgment granted in favor of the government, we held that constitutionally ineffective notice voided…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Alexander v. OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Rodriguez-AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. William Longenette v. Peter Krusing William E. Perry, Special Agent Fbi Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  4. Garrett v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. Harms v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API