Legal Opinion

Stransky v. Healthone of Denver, Inc.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided June 14, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-cv-02888-WJM-MJWPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO TOLL THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, District Judge.

In this collective civil action, Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, bring claims against Defendant HealthONE of Denver, Inc. (“HealthONE”) alleging that Defendant failed to adequately compensate them in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Toll the Statute of Limitations (the “Motion”). (ECF No. 36.)

For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Gwendolyn T. Graham-Humphreys, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Memphis Brooks Museum of Art, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Struck v. PNC Bank N.A.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  2. Dualan v. Jacob Transportation Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
  3. Kutzback v. LMS Intellibound, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2017
  4. Koehler v. Freightquote.Com, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2015
  5. Adedje v. Westat, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API