New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Warren
New York Supreme Court
Motion for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtBetts, J.
■ This matter comes before me on an order to show ¡cause why an injunction should not be granted herein pending the trial of the action substantially as asked for in the complaint,
i The facts disclosed by 'the papers are substantially as follows: .The complaint shows that the plaintiff railroad company, as lessee of the West Shore railroad, is in possession of certain lands about *572the railroad station at Marlborough, Ulster county, N. Y., and maintains said grounds for its railroad business for the accommodation of the public traveling on its railroad, and has laid out and maintains a private…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Old Colony Railroad v. TrippMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- McCann v. RandallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Brown v. New York Central & Hudson Biver RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. FlynnNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Thompson v. VroomanNew York Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- Donovan v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. RyanNew York Supreme Court · 1911
- N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. v. BorkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1901
- New York Central Railroad Co. v. ArtheliaNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Kansas City Terminal Railway Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.