Legal Opinion

Kansas City Terminal Railway Co. v. James

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 28, 1923Published

1DissentDavid E. Blair, J.

(dissenting). — I am unable to concur in the majority opinion. Such opinion adopts the statement made by Small, C., in the opinion written by him in Division One. I fully concur in Judge Small’s opinion and adopt that portion of his opinion following the statement (already set out in the majority opinion) and beginning -with paragraph II as my dissenting opinion in this case.

2ConcurrenceGraves, J.

“II. We have no doubt that the plaintiff may have intended, in fact did intend, to give the exclusive right to the Shaw Taxicab Company to solicit business and stand its cabs upon its grounds and Plaza, sidewalks and…

3Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Minnesota Ex Rel. State Railroad & Warehouse CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  4. Old Colony Railroad v. TrippMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API