Legal Opinion

State v. Redman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 20, 1996No. 78380PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

The rule against hearsay to the contrary notwithstanding, section 491.075.1(1), (2)(a), RSMo 1994, admits as evidence testimony concerning out-of-court statements made by a child under the age of twelve who is the alleged victim of sexual abuse to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the child’s statement if the trial court finds “that the time, content and circumstances of the statement provide sufficient indicia of reliability” and “[t]he child testifies at the proceedings.” Id.

In Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805, 821, 110 S.Ct. 3139, 3149, 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990), the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. State v. SorensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. LawhornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. State v. ShockleySupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  4. BAUMRUK v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API