Legal Opinion

Matthews v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 18, 2005No. SC 86784PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

Ecclesiastes Matthews (“Movant”) appeals the overruling of his motion for post-conviction relief, filed under Rule 29.15, without an evidentiary hearing. He asserts that, although he requested a Rule 32.03 change of venue at trial, his attorney did not object when the trial court failed to change venue to another county as required by the rule. After an opinion by the Court of Appeals, Eastern District, this Court granted transfer. Mo. Const, art. V, sec. 10. This Court finds that although Movant was entitled to a change of venue to another county, he did not suffer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. Coates v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. State v. RedmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Strong v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  3. Webb v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  4. McIntosh v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. Greer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API