Legal Opinion
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 16, 1940No. 29161PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an original proceeding to review an order of the State Industrial Commission fixing an attorney’s fee under the provisions of section 13364, O. S. 1931. The facts out of which the present controversy arose are set out at length in Conrad v. State Industrial Commission, 181 Okla. 324, 73 P. 2d 858, and need not be restated herein. After the decision in that case the commission, upon evidence taken at a hearing after due notice, fixed and approved an attorney’s fee of $450 to Conrad, making it a lien upon the award, and this proceeding is brought by the employer to review the award.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Sargent v. . McLeodNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Conrad v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Thompson v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Clark v. Armstrong MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- ACCOSIF v. American States Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Nestle Food Co. v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- O. C. Whitaker, Inc. v. DillinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- James v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Crane Manufacturing Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.