Legal Opinion

James v. State Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1957No. 37560PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Justice.

This is a proceeding by Harry James, petitioner herein, to review an order of the State Industrial Commission awarding him an attorney fee for services rendered claimant in a compensation proceeding.

The record discloses that on March 23, 1955, Mary Bowen, hereinafter referred to as claimant, filed a claim for compensation against BuRer-Sparks Equipment Com» pany and its insurance carrier for an accidental injury alleged to have been sustained by her while in the employ of the equipment company on the 9th day' of October, 1954.

She employed petitioner as her attorney to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Suttle v. ChadwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. James v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hix v. White Swan Food ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. City of Purcell v. WilbanksCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Carillo v. CrownoverCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Rowland v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Rowland v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API