Legal Opinion
United States v. Crisp
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 3, 1999No. CV-F-97-5044 OWW LJOPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; DEFENDANT WANDA CRISP’S MOTION TO DISMISS; CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case is before the Court on various motions and counter-motions of the parties for summary judgment. Plaintiff originally filed four complaints. The first was against Sequoia Property and Equipment Limited Partnership (filed 1/22/97); the second against Hyper-Jean Property and Equipment Limited Partnership (filed 1/30/98); the third against Wanda Jean Crisp, Hyper-Jean Property and Equipment Limited…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
- GFL Advantage Fund, Ltd. V. ColkittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. KempthorneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Albertson v. Fremont CountyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2011
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.