Legal Opinion

Yarber v. Pennell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1969No. 17234PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAUDE WILLIAMS, Justice.

The principal question involved in this appeal is whether the doctrine of judicial estoppel effectively barred appellant’s plea of limitations against appellee’s suit on a promissory note.

On January IS, 1960 Robert A. Yarber executed his note in the principal sum of $10,000 payable to the order of Truman K. Pennell. Yarber received the $10,-000 in money. The note was due June 15, 1960. On or about that date Yarber paid $300 accrued interest but has not paid any other portion of the principal or interest. On November 18, 1960 Pennell, as plaintiff in Cause No. 56-195-H…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Long v. KnoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Sartain v. Dixie Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Smith v. ChipleyTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Melton v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  5. City of Nederland v. CallihanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Johnson Service Company v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Finley v. KeslingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. LaChance v. McKownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Miles v. Plumbing Services of Houston, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API