Legal Opinion

LaChance v. McKown

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 1983No. 9082PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Appellants purchased lots from appellees in a real estate development, and later brought suit alleging appellees had breached certain restrictive covenants and had made false representations concerning the development. Suit was brought under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 17.41 et seq. (Vernon Supp.1982-1983); the Real Estate Fraud Act, Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 27.01 (Vernon 1968); and Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1293b (Vernon 1980), pertaining to breach of restrictive covenants. A jury answered all issues in appellees’ favor and found…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Long v. KnoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bocanegra v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Traylor v. GouldingTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Harmes v. Arklatex Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Donwerth v. Preston II Chrysler-Dodge, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Blizzard v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  3. Bader v. Cox, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  4. Estate of Devitt, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1988
  5. Caekaert v. State Compensation Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API