Salisbury v. Hekla Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Lochren, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
Defendant’, by its agent at Minneapolis, made orally a contract with plaintiffs, acting by their agent, insuring plaintiffs’ building used as a manufactory in the sum of $150, and the stock and machinery therein in the sum of $350, against loss by fire, for a premium at the rate of 6 per cent, on the amount of insurance for one year, the risk to'commence at once, to wit, February 17, 1883; a written policy to be made and delivered as soon as could be done. The premium was not then paid, and nothing was said as to when it should be. On the night of February 18th, the manufactory then running,…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Cleveland Oil Co. v. Norwich Ins. SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. BabcockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Fort Valley Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Ganser v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.