Legal Opinion
Morin v. Trupin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 27, 1992No. 88 Civ. 5743 (RWS), 89 Civ. 6639 (RWS) and 90 Civ. 3475 (RWS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in the related actions of Morin v. Trupin, No. 88 Civ. 5743, and Alberti v. Trupin, No. 90 Civ. 3475, have moved pursuant to § 476 of the FDIC Improvement Act of 1991, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa, to reinstate their claims under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 which were previously dismissed as time-barred by opinion and order of this court dated November 18, 1991 (the “Opinion”). See Morin v. Trupin, 778 F.Supp. 711 (S.D.N.Y.1991). For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Backgro…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Armstrong v. McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.