Morin v. Trupin
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Emmanuel Organek (“Orga-nek”), President of Continental Realty (“Continental”), and Stuart Becker and Stuart Becker, P.C., (collectively “the Becker Defendants” or “Becker”), have moved to reargue this Court’s determination that the Plaintiffs in the Morin and in the Alberti actions had adequately pled securities and common law fraud against them. For the reasons given below, Organek’s motion to reargue is granted and Becker’s motion .to reargue is denied. Upon reconsideration, - Organek’s motion to dismiss the securities fraud claims against him is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Luce v. EdelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Denny v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Armstrong v. McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Independent Energy Corp. v. Trigen Energy Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In Re New York Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Ameritrust Co. National Ass'n v. DewDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Dietrich v. BauerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- System Management Arts Inc. v. Avesta Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.