Legal Opinion
Pierce v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 25, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-0134PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Defendant has filed a motion for reconsideration (EOF No. 95) of the Memorandum Opinion and Order that this Court issued publicly on September 11, 2015 (ECF Nos. 88, 90). Motions for reconsideration of court orders that “do not constitute final judgments in a case” are governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), Prince George’s Hosp. Ctr. v. Advantage Healthplan Inc., 985 F.Supp.2d 38, 42 (D.D.C.2013) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), and “[rjelief under Rule 54(b) is available as justice…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Prince George's Hospital Center v. Advantage Healthplan Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
3Cited by4 opinions
- David Updike v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- South Carolina v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Alliance of Artists & Recording Cos. v. Gen. Motors Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- McFadden v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016