Legal Opinion
David Updike v. Multnomah County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 31, 2017No. 15-35254PublishedCited by 150 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
David Updike, who has been deaf since birth, uses American Sign Language (“ASL”) as his primary language. He brings this action against Defendants the State of Oregon (“State”) and Multnomah County (“County”), alleging that the State and the County did not provide him with an ASL interpreter at his arraignment on criminal charges, and that the County did not provide him with an ASL interpreter and other auxiliary aids in order for Updike to effectively communicate while he was in pretrial detainment and under pretrial supervision. Updike brings claims for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Gray v. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Faour Fraihat v. US Imm. & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- James O'Doan v. Joshua SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Rodney Koon v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Lexyington McIntyre v. Eugene School District 4jCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.